Macrons file new defamation lawsuit against Candace Owens in Tennessee

French President Emmanuel and his wife Brigitte Macron have brought a fresh defamation lawsuit against Candace Owens in her home state of Tennessee. This legal action marks a significant escalation in a transatlantic dispute as the far-right US podcaster continues to spread false claims regarding the French first lady. Many people searching for details about emmanuel brigitte macron will find that this latest complaint follows an initial legal filing made in Delaware in July 2025. That earlier response targeted Owens and her media companies over statements describing verifiably false and devastating untruths repeated on her podcast and on X.

The initial court action highlighted claims that Brigitte Macron, aged 73, was born a male named Jean-Michel Trogneux, who is actually her older brother, and committed identity theft to hide a transition. Additional allegations mentioned by Owens included that the French leader came to power via a CIA mind-control initiative and that the couple were blood-related relatives engaging in incest. Following a judicial ruling limiting the Delaware scope to companies registered there because Owens did not personally reside in the state, the new filing was introduced on November 4 in Nashville.

The fresh complaint lodged in Owens's home jurisdiction includes 88 counts covering defamation, false light, and defamation by implication. It targets Owens personally and builds upon demands for punitive damages due to her persistence with the claims. Legal representatives for the couple noted that the venue was selected because Owens repeatedly insisted it belonged there. Since the initial lawsuit, the complaint states that Owens doubled down through an eight-part podcast series titled Becoming Brigitte alongside posts on X.

The Macrons filed 88 new defamation counts against US podcaster Candace Owens in Tennessee.

The filing further alleges a financial motivation, asserting that Owens uses her platform to expand falsehoods, sell merchandise mocking the couple, and collect donations. It also cites a merchandise item described as a grotesque, alien-like figure termed a Brigitte doll, which the suit claims ridicules Mrs Macron's physical appearance and indicates animus based on gender identity. The Macrons seek actual, presumed, and punitive damages, alongside an injunction preventing the republication of defamatory statements.

Why it matters

This ongoing transatlantic legal battle highlights the growing intersection of cross-border digital media reach, online defamation, and accountability for prominent internet commentators. The case tests the legal boundaries surrounding false narratives spread across international jurisdictions by high-follower digital personalities.