
NewJeans K-pop contracts allegedly omitted rights to sleep and free choice
Representative photo · Photo: UNC - CFC - USFK / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0
A report reveals that the K-pop group NewJeans signed restrictive contracts as minors that waived basic rights to rest, education, and free choice.
A recent report from the New York Times has shed light on the restrictive nature of agreements signed by the K-pop group NewJeans. Documents obtained by the publication indicate that the record label Ador, a subsidiary of Hybe, excluded standard child protection clauses from the contracts of the performers, who were aged between 14 and 17 at the time of signing. These agreements reportedly waived the artists' rights to sleep, rest, and free choice.
Understanding the NewJeans K-pop contract dispute
Beyond limiting personal time, the contracts prohibited an “insincere attitude” and restricted romantic relationships. Notably, the documents removed standard language intended to protect basic human rights, such as the right to education. Furthermore, the agreements omitted government-recommended protections against excessive physical exposure or sexually suggestive content for minors. The contracts also stipulated that the group would be responsible for repaying a portion of costs associated with cosmetic procedures, though Hybe stated in response that it does not recommend such surgeries against an individual’s wishes.
The K-pop group NewJeans signed restrictive contracts as minors that waived their rights to sleep and rest.
The agreements granted Ador rights to use the members’ names, voices, and likenesses in perpetuity, extending beyond the termination of the contract. This clause also permits the label to utilize the members as AI-generated clones or chatbots. Sources noted that the group, which includes members Minji, Hanni, Haerin, Hyein, and Danielle, underwent years of rigorous training before signing, with rehearsals often lasting until 2am.
Hybe representatives maintained to the New York Times that their contracts were negotiated in good faith, are legally sound, and include protections for both the artists and the company’s investments. The company denied that its exit penalties exceed industry standards. Meanwhile, the band members have publicly alleged mistreatment, with Hanni citing “deliberate miscommunications and manipulation” during a testimony before South Korea’s parliament. Amid ongoing legal battles and contract disputes, Ador has sued members and staff for significant damages, while the group has faced internal shifts, including the absence of Danielle in recent promotional teasers.
Why it matters
The revelations highlight the intense conditions within the K-pop industry and the power imbalance between major labels and young performers. By exposing the removal of standard child protections, the report raises significant questions about the ethical oversight of talent management for minors.
This situation affects the global K-pop fanbase and sets a precedent for how record labels handle the rights of young artists. For international observers, it underscores the need for standardized, transparent legal protections in the entertainment sector.
Sources
More like this

Russell Brand Investigated Over Two New Rape Complaints Following Conviction

TV Insiders Warn That Misogyny Meaning and Sexism Persist After Russell Brand Case

Russell Brand Found Guilty of Rape and Sexual Assault

