Eenadu Epaper: Bombay High Court Slams BMC Over Dia Mirza Video
The Bombay High Court criticized the BMC for removing an environment awareness video featuring Dia Mirza and ordered it to be re-uploaded.
Readers searching for eenadu epaper updates will find significant legal developments regarding an environmental campaign in Mumbai. The Bombay High Court expressed deep concern and strong displeasure after the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation removed a Diwali pollution awareness video featuring actor Dia Mirza from social media following objections from political leaders and individuals.
What is eenadu epaper?
Eenadu Epaper is a widely searched digital news platform in India that provides readers with access to daily regional news coverage, updates, and current affairs. It serves as a key source of information for readers tracking national events, judicial rulings, and civic updates across various regions in the country.
Why is it trending?
The topic is trending due to the recent high-profile controversy surrounding the BMC's campaign video. To promote a pollution-free and environmentally friendly Diwali, the civic body had engaged prominent personalities, including actors Dia Mirza and Madhuri Dixit, along with cricketer Ajinkya Rahane. The initiative aimed to reduce air and noise pollution by urging citizens not to burst firecrackers on roads, referencing high court directives. Following objections raised by BJP leaders, including Maharashtra minister Nitesh Rane, the BMC deleted the promotional clips from its social media accounts, prompting judicial intervention.
The Bombay High Court ordered the BMC to re-upload the Dia Mirza pollution awareness video immediately.
What happened in court?
A division bench comprising Justice Girish Kulkarni and Justice Neela Gokhale criticized the decision to pull down the video, noting that some individuals exhibited a narrow mindset. The court emphasized that our nation is secular and that citizens must foster a secular spirit regardless of caste, religion, or community. The judges highlighted that air has no religion, and leaders holding public office should not behave in a manner that undermines unity. They also noted that none of the critics had produced any similar environmental awareness videos themselves.
Why it matters
This ruling reaffirms that public initiatives aimed at environmental protection, such as reducing air and noise pollution, should transcend religious and caste considerations. It affects civic administration policies and highlights the judiciary's stance on protecting public awareness campaigns from politically motivated censorship, ensuring that messages regarding ecological preservation remain untainted by unnecessary controversies.